Community Engagement

Community engagement is “the process of working collaboratively with and through groups of people affiliated by geographic proximity, special interest, or similar situations to address issues affecting the well-being of those people.”23

“How do we authentically engage community to help solve problems and address challenges? Communities might not define challenges in the same way, or might even have a different way of thinking about the challenges than we would. We need to understand from a community’s perspective. It’s about the agency of individuals.”
– MSC Staff Member, WA

Key Takeaways

  • Both intentional inclusion of community and decision-making with community help ensure that multisector collaboratives address community issues and move toward equity.
  • Community engagement should reflect the diversity of the community.
  • Participants had mixed feelings about community engagement, and those feelings influenced their perception of the MSC’s capabilities.

Addressing community needs requires intentional community engagement. Regardless of where a multisector collaborative operates—whether they serve 1,000 people or 100,000 people, urban neighborhoods or remote coastal islands—it is essential that MSCs work directly with community members to understand their needs and concerns.

More than that, MSCs should seek to empower community members to be directly involved in confronting health issues. This requires a dramatic shift in business-as-usual for health partners. Rather than only seeing community members in clinics when they are facing health problems, community engagement means proactively engaging community members to guide MSC priorities, inform the development of health interventions, implement effective strategies, and even assess the success of health interventions.

Previous research has demonstrated that involving community members in health research, programming, and interventions can lead to improved equity, address social drivers of health, and overall improve health outcomes. However, research on community engagement within multisector collaboratives is sparse. Our research offers initial insight into the extent to which MSCs engage community, what influence this has on perceptions of the MSC, and what community engagement strategies were employed by MSCs.

Survey Findings:

  • 50% of respondents said their MSC is doing a lot to engage residents who represent the community to inform its work (n=133).
  • 48% of respondents said their MSC is doing a lot to explicitly involve Medicaid consumers and/or community residents in decision-making (n=120).
  • 59% of respondents said their MSC is doing a lot to offer support & resources to encourage Indigenous communities, communities of color, & other historically marginalized groups who disproportionately experience health disparities to be active in the ACH (n=157).
  • 58% of respondents said their MSC is doing a lot to make events or meetings accessible to everyone (e.g. providing interpretation services, scheduling meetings outside work hours, offering options to join by web or phone, etc.) (n=153).

Perceptions of Community Engagement

As evidenced by the survey results, MSC participants had mixed feelings about their MSC’s ability to effectively engagement the community. These results were not uniform. Perceptions of strong community engagement varied by different local contexts and participant backgrounds. We found that:

  • Not every MSC was seen as equally effective as engaging community.
  • MSCs that served larger geographic areas tended to have better perceptions of community engagement.
  • MSCs with public funding tended to have better perceptions of community engagement.
  • People from tribal communities and nations, as well as people who worked with the MSC, tended to have better perceptions of community engagement, while people who worked in social services and public health tended to have worse perceptions.

The Influence of Community Engagement

Based on these perceptions, we found that when people believed there was stronger community engagement, they also believed that the MSC was doing better with its finances, its ability to create collective action, and its ability to use data.

“There’s just not an equal distribution of voices at our decision-making table. It is very healthcare heavy. And then just because you have a representative that is supposed to be the voice of this sector, or the voice of that sector…it’s one person, and that is not meaningful community engagement, like you are engaging that one person, and are they supposed to be thinking on behalf of their sector? Absolutely. But you’re still bringing the people who are the power holders.”
– MSC Staff Member, WA

Strategies for Community Engagement

Finally, we witnessed different strategies for engaging community, which we can divide into two groups. Intentional inclusion and engagement meant making the MSC accessible to all community members, as well as purposefully making efforts to bring community members to the MSC. Community-driven decision making meant substantively including community members in the work of the MSC in order to shift power structures, giving community members power to change how things were being done. We’ll conclude with some strategies for community engagement, a great example taken from our research, and some resources.

Intentional Inclusion and Engagement

Invite Public Comment
  • Open board meetings
  • Reserve time for public comment
  • Host community conversations & learning sessions
  • Provide clear contact information
Encourage Diverse Participation
  • Engage in culturally & linguistically appropriate ways
  • Offer materials in multiple languages
  • Hire racially, ethnically, & linguistically diverse staff
  • Educate participants on traditional medicine & tribal sovereignty
Make Meetings Accessible
  • Offer multiple options to join
  • Educate on web-based meeting platforms
  • Rotate in-person meeting locations
  • Hold meetings outside of working hours
  • Provide compensation for participation

Community-Driven Decision Making

Participatory Budgeting
  • Participants have equal power to prioritize MSC spending
  • Community members participate on grants committees
Community Engagement in Governance
  • Community voices council
  • Tribal alignment committee
  • Medicaid consumer committee
Community Checks on Governing Boards
  • Tribal alignment committee reviews board recommendations to assess tribal impact
  • Community councils recommend action and sign-off on board decisions

“We were having an event and at one point, there was a youth that stood up and was like, ‘Why am I the only youth here?’ She is an indigenous leader and said, ‘There’s a lot of behavioral health needs. I want youth to be more focused.’ And so we asked her if she’d be willing to lead in and help shape what that looks like to make sure that we’re meeting what she believes the needs are within her communities… And so as a direct result of that there was an indigenous youth convening that was held in the fall.”
– MSC Staff Member, WA

Related Resources


View all references for the Data Walk.